Skip to content

Mass Effect Andromeda

I just finished the final battle in Mass Effect Andromeda, and I have very mixed feelings.

Mostly, I enjoyed the game. When it was good, it was great – there were moments in there which were on par with any of the other Mass Effect games. It was trying to tackle big ideas – the implications of creating life, exploration and colonialism, and how science and warfare play on those – and give players a choice in how they shape their version of Andromeda.

The game was gorgeous. My machine runs it at full resolution, and I loved drinking in the alien landscapes. I could feel the hot dry wind on Kadara and a chill on Voeld (although that might just be #TheBeastFromTheEast). I enjoyed roaming around the different planets in the Nomad, and doing the whole exploration thing.

The combat was great – really well balanced, lots of options depending on your play style. It had a fun crafting system which is not a sentence I thought I’d ever say. The game also had a story mode if you just wanted to skip the combat. There were times when the game was just spamming enemies at you, but that’s a problem common to all Mass Effect games, and is part of what allows the game scale the final battles so they’re appropriate whatever level you’re at when you trigger that plot mission.


The pacing of the game was all over the place. Certain plot-arcs seemed to take forever, others happened in a blink-and-you’ll-miss it moment. This robbed many of big moments of their emotional impact, as there was little build up. At least once I found myself thinking “wait, was that it?” as the game moved me into the next chapter.

It may be the relationship options that I chose in the game, but some of the characters were lacking in depth, and others just won’t stop talking. Maybe it says something about me that my least favourite crew mates were the humans.

The thing that annoyed me most about the game was how meh many things felt. There’s a lot of incomplete, or half-assed content.

People talked a lot about how flat and affectless the facial animations were in the game, but I was willing to let that slide as potentially being limited by the engine, or by tooling – I like to give people the benefit of the doubt.┬áThe moment before one of the final battles where Ryder scrunches up her face in anger ruined that. It was fantastically expressive, and showed what the engine could have done. Similarly, the Archon’s lip-syncing towards the end was great – he was sneering up a storm, and I couldn’t wait to slap him around Meridian.

The moments of well-done gameplay or facial animation, or character interaction only serve to highlight what the rest of the game is missing. I’m annoyed because I feel cheated out of a more complete game.

I read a great article about the development of the game, and how it was a complete mess. I believe it. This has all the hallmarks of a software product released too soon. I couldn’t even start the game for 10 days because its anti-copyright scheme didn’t like the language setting on my operating system – that’s basic QA. But it also has all the hallmarks of a software product that has been in development for too long – scope creep, extraneous content and features, and a lack of focus. It’s rare that a game exhibits both of these problems at the same time, and yet here we are.

Mass Effect Andromeda kept me amused for its duration, and for that, I am thankful. At its best, it delighted me, but the distance between those moments of delight only served to highlight how “good enough” the rest of the game was, and I think that’s a shame.

{ 4 } Comments

  1. Morgan | 2018-03-02 at 14:02 | Permalink

    Have you seen the video Extra Credits did about the animation? It’s an interesting insider’s look (the hosts works in animation), and the gist of it is that it has the hallmarks of automated sync/expression done from script and by tools, with most scenes not getting the second pass to fine-tune the rough output.

    That “undercooked for too long” phenomenon is more common than you might realize, in projects that get repeatedly meddled with via executive diktat, so that the work already done gets repeatedly thrown out and the team has to start from scratch with mostly the bad ideas baked in, leaving them with an ever-accumulating list of promises and less and less time in which to deliver on them.

  2. irokie | 2018-03-02 at 17:58 | Permalink

    Yeah – There’s an article I read which said that’s almost exactly what happened, and it’s incredibly frustrating.

    I mean the game also shares the standard Mass Effect issue with making you feel like your three-person squad is an important part of a fight with thousands of participants, but it actually does a reasonable job of this. Like, it did enough things right to show what could have been, and that’s the most frustrating thing.

  3. admin | 2018-03-02 at 18:56 | Permalink

    Here’s that article I was talking about earlier:

  4. Morgan | 2018-03-05 at 14:28 | Permalink

    Interesting to see the mentions of No Man’s Sky. A lot of Andromeda’s problems were being described almost from release as due to biting off more (giant procedurally generated open worlds in an open galaxy) than they could chew (with the technology and tools available). How much of that came from looking at another game promising similar that turned out to be massively overselling itself? How much of the open world fad amounts to the same – management looking at competitors and saying “well, they’re delivering this stuff so we have to, too”, when in reality almost none of them are delivering at all?

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *